Client engagements as they occurred

Context

A clinical-stage biotechnology company needed a leadership-level deck for a CFO and CSO presentation covering gene editing and microbiome science. Three days remained before the presentation, and the scientific director was unsure the scope could be met in the time available.

Approach

SciVoc fixed the scope and slide architecture on the briefing call, a writer was assigned, and communication was consistent. SciVoc drafted 8 to 10 slides for review, and the review ran as a working session, so newly supplied data was absorbed directly into the narrative.

Context

A global pharmaceutical client required a time-critical protocol amendment in infectious diseases, drafted and submission-ready within five working days.

Approach

The assignment went directly to a regulatory writer with the relevant therapeutic background, who scoped the amendment against the submission requirement before drafting began.

Context

An oncology-focused company approached SciVoc days before a major international congress needing booth content and a product slide set — concept, design and delivery inside a window that could not extend, because the congress date was fixed.

Approach

The brief was taken from the CSO and the work ran as one cycle: booth content redesigned and product slides developed together, with scheduled review calls so changes were absorbed as they arose.

Context

A CRO required a run of urgent regulatory documents for its own global pharmaceutical client: a minimum of seven to eight protocols in diabetes and obesity, delivered one after another, at a quality the CRO could pass on without rework.

Approach

Each protocol was contracted as a separate engagement, delivered one after another. SciVoc streamlined communication, delivery, and quality control across the run, so each document met the same standard as the one before it.

Context

Two medical writing agencies asked SciVoc to resolve quality issues on a publication program in nephrology and rheumatoid arthritis. Their shared client considered the drafts in hand off-brief, and both agency relationships were under review. Any error on SciVoc’s side would have carried straight into those relationships.

Approach

SciVoc worked from the client’s original brief rather than the drafts in hand, rebuilt both papers against the source data, and brought them to submission standard inside a single revision cycle.

Context

Clinical-stage biotechnology companies, research institutes and mid-tier medtech organizations brought SciVoc subject matter they had not been able to place: AI platforms in drug development, modeling and simulation, non-clinical studies, solid tumors, and substance abuse — the last as a combined systematic literature review and position document.

Approach

Writers were assigned by subject matter. The topics were unrelated and each ran on its own timeline.